by Joe Olivieri

August 24, 2012

Do you like this?

Central Health places tax increase on ballot

Photo by Joe Olivieri

State Sen. Kirk Watson, D-District 14, said now is the time to improve health care in Travis County.

Funds would help improve local medical care

This November, Travis County voters will decide whether to support a large tax increase for their health care district.

At its Aug. 15 meeting, the Central Health board of managers unanimously voted to place a proposition on the ballot asking voters to raise the tax rate by 5 cents.

That would take the 2013 tax rate from 7.8946 cents to 12.9 cents per $100 of valuation. If voters approved the proposition, it would mean a $107.29 property tax increase for a taxpayer with an average homestead assessed at $214,567.

Central Health officials said they are asking for the money in order to afford projects that could be assisted by federal funds.

These funds would come from the 1115 Medicaid Waiver, which is intended to encourage the creation of new projects to improve how health care is delivered locally while still reimbursing hospitals for treating low-income patients. As part of the waiver, the federal government will match $1.46 for every dollar that is locally generated.

Central Health said approving the tax increase would produce $200 million more over the life of the waiver than if the health care district simply adopted smaller increases during that same time.

Prior to the meeting, state Sen. Kirk Watson, D-District 14, and representatives from Austin’s business, education and health care communities held a news conference calling on Central Health to place the tax increase on the ballot.

Watson tied the tax increase to regional health care improvements such as the new teaching hospital that Seton Healthcare Family plans to build to replace University Medical Center Brackenridge.

Central Health officials have said waiver money cannot go toward the construction of a new separate medical school but will likely fund services there.

At the meeting, the managers praised the waiver as a unique opportunity to better serve the entire community, especially the uninsured, low-income residents and those with chronic conditions.

“We cannot [make reforms] without the community’s help. The time is now. We will not be given this opportunity [the 1115 Waiver] again,” Central Health Chairwoman Rosie Mendoza said.

“This is not a vote for a teaching hospital. This is not a vote for a medical school. This is simply a vote to put the tax increase for voters to decide,” Central Health Vice Chairman Frank Rodriguez said.

Waiver 101

During the 2011 legislative session, Texas officials decided to expand Medicaid managed care and use HMOs to coordinate care for the poor, said Sarah Cook, Central Health director of business development.

However, doing so would have stopped Texas hospitals from receiving supplemental federal funds to help pay for treating Medicaid patients.

Texas applied for and received approval for the five-year waiver, which allows hospitals to still receive supplemental funding in the short term but move toward improving health care through new programs. Central Health is in the first year of the waiver with major changes expected in years two through five. The waiver is unrelated to the Affordable Care Act.

A simple way of thinking of the waiver is that one stream of federal government money is being split into two buckets, said Jeff Knodel, Central Health director of regional health care partnership.

The first bucket is a revised version of the same supplemental federal funds hospitals already receive and is now called the Uncompensated Care pool of money.

So-called “charity care” is a significant percentage of a hospital’s activities. Seton Healthcare Family spent $193 million on it in 2011, said Greg Hartman, CEO of Seton Medical Center Austin and University Medical Center Brackenridge.

John Stephens, Central Health chief financial officer, said that emergency rooms are getting overused for nonemergencies.

“We need to get people out of the ER. Otherwise, we are paying more than we need and having people wait longer than they need. We need people to get the right care at the right time and place,” he said.

Hartman said follow-up care to treat chronic illnesses was also costly.

The second bucket, called the Delivery System Reform Incentive Payments, has the funds that Central Health will use to improve how it delivers care.

“What we cannot forget is that [the waiver’s] full name is the Texas Healthcare Transformation and Quality Improvement Program,” Cook said. “We are supposed to do bold things with these funds. [Officials] do not want to see the same old projects.”

Earlier this summer, health care providers submitted draft programs to Central Health. Central Health helped shape the projects and evaluated them based on need, feasibility and admissibility, Cook said.

Central Health is expected to send a formal project plan to the state in September and federal government before Oct. 31.

Once the plan is approved, Central Health will send local tax dollars to the state to participate in the match. The health care providers will begin the programs. The providers meet predetermined performance targets and then receive the matched funds.

Reactions

At the meeting, public comment was divided between speakers who supported the increase and those who criticized it as overtaxation and not serving the people Central Health aims to help.

The district had received eight resolutions from groups supporting the increase, including the Austin Chamber of Commerce, the Downtown Austin Alliance and The University of Texas Alumni Association.

Former Austin City Council candidate Laura Pressley said the ballot proposition represents an almost 70 percent tax increase and that support of a medical school does not fall under Central Health’s mission.

Resident Richard Franklin said that residents cannot afford to pay for Central Health’s growth.

“Please help us and find other ways to pay for this. We need services, not a medical school. The people in the community will not be getting those jobs,” he said.

Draft projects in the 1115 Waiver

One of the goals of the 1115 Waiver is to create new programs to improve local health care. Travis County’s health care district, Central Health, collected draft project proposals from the six counties that comprise the Region 7 Regional Healthcare Partnership.

Some draft projects in Travis County:

  • Create therapeutic counseling centers for students on Austin ISD campuses
  • Create a team to assess people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and stabilize them when they are having behavioral issues
  • Create neighborhood outpatient center to treat behavioral health issues and promote health and wellness
  • Create a 16-bed psychiatric crisis facility for extended observation
  • Implement a health and wellness program for people with psychiatric illnesses that include tobacco cessation, healthy eating, a program to help navigate getting health care and a physical activity program.
  • Expand mobile crisis outreach team
  • Establish home health network to treat people who have chronic physical health conditions and behavioral health disorders
  • Increase public understanding of mental illness and knowledge through certifying more mental health instructors
  • Administer immunizations for high-risk populations at STD clinic
  • Expand diabetes self-management and lifestyle classes among high-risk populations
  • Develop an electronic medical records system
  • Create a patient care navigation program
  • Expand HIV/STD screening and counseling
  • Coordinate substance abuse and homeless services projects
  • Expand current efforts to reduce tobacco use

by Joe Olivieri

August 24, 2012

Latest Comments

  • Travis Co. Healthcare Tax Prop.1

    The Healthcare Tax is supposed to be $.05 per $100 of property tax liability... To help pay for the new UT Medical School... I wonder, do Dallas, Houston, Galveston, and SA property owners also have to pay for 10% of their UT medical schools? Our tax liability is already one of the highest in the state, and these propositions seem to add more and more to it each year...

    Posted by Kevin Kanz October 09, 2012 16:22:10

  • Central Health tax increase

    Austin voters need a way to ask questions about this proposed tax increase. Specifically, the article says that the money will go for a Medicaid waiver match, and mentions to amount that would be raised "over the life of the waiver." So, the waiver will expire and the federal funds end at some point - will the tax increase also disappear? Doubt it. Then the Central Health officials are quoted as saying "This is not a vote for a teaching hospital. This is not a vote for a medical school." And they say that waiver money cannot go for construction of those things. And the list of "draft projects in the waiver" has many good things in it, but no mention of either a medical school or teaching hospital, and the waiver is supposed to create a "healthcare transformation and quality improvement," not a medical school. Yet every single mention of the tax increase now says it is for a medical school, not the services that are actually needed.
    So, where can voters go to get the facts about what appears to be a hard push for property owners to pay for something we do not need, and is being described as a great economic development opportunity? I am willing to help pay for needed services, but not a medical school so developers can make a bunch of money.

    Posted by M. Clarke September 24, 2012 19:04:11

  • This is an absurd proposal!

    In addition the proposed increase to property owners would effectively force MANY middle income home owners right out of their homes. Who can sustain a 63% increase in one fell swoop! Not me, and not many many others. This is absurd!!!!!! I plan on campiagning in every way I can to oppose this.

    Posted by Here, here! September 21, 2012 20:50:13

  • Health Care District Tax Increase Not Fair

    Whats really at stake here is that Austin needs a new city hospital. Its fine that Kirk Watson wants a Medical School and it probably would benefit the community. But the argument that we need to increase property taxes to help pay for it is absurd in times of fiscal restraint. The monies raised would pay for not the building but to offset the costs of the medical students, professors and residents. The big question is- Why should tax payers be on the hook to pay for their education. I paid for my own medical education with loans and money i saved, not tax payer subsidies. I can't think of any city that raises taxes to pay for medical students education. Most students get grants, or loans. Since when is it property tax payer's burden to help pay for medical professionals when they will become large income earners at some point in their career as compared to the general population? The HCD formed this proposal without public discussion but with lawyers in closed session. Does this tell you anything? Sure Im for better access and support the poor. But this will not stop people from going to the ER for their care, which a large portion do. Most dont want to wait in a clinic to be seen. And by law no one can be turned down at the ER. I have worked in health care for 20 years in Austin. I have seen a lot. And all the major players including St. Davids and Seton take their share of poor folks who dont have health care insurance. But with Obamcare thats supposed to improve? Right? In 2014? Med School Good for Austin- But not at the public's expense. Let the funding come from Seton, UT, the State, or private means. HCD has no business in the medical school business. Its wrong for tax payers and unfair. If Seton and Kirk Watson need more primary care physicians let them hire them for that specific purpose. This would be much cheaper than building a half billion dollar medical school. The medical school would provide cheap labor (physicians in training- just like i did when i did my training as a student nurse anesthetist and earned ZERO dollars) and at the public's expense. I PAID MY OWN MEDICAL EDUCATION and so should medical students, medical residents, etc.

    Posted by Paul Violand, CRNA, MS September 04, 2012 21:03:48

Add your thoughts

  

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Please do not post the same comment more than once.

SWA Impacts
  • Southwest Austin Impacts

    Now Open: Dr. Beemer

    Auto repair business Dr. Beemer opened at 8901 S. First St. in April. Dr. Beemer had been subleasing space at Big Boys Collision Center, 1013 W. Slaughter Lane.

    May 21, 2013 12:00:00 AM

  • Southwest Austin Impacts

    Now Open: Impact Family Church

    Impact Family Church began holding services Jan. 6 at Clint Small Middle School, 4801 Monterrey Oaks Blvd. Led by Pastors John and Alison Larkham, services are held on Sundays at 10 a.m. The church was previously called World Harvest Outreach Church.

    May 21, 2013 12:00:00 AM

  • Southwest Austin Impacts

    Now Open: Austin Oaks Hospital

    Austin Oaks Hospital opened May 21. The 51,420-square-foot, $17 million facility is located at 1407 W. Stassney Lane. Providing mental health care for children and adults, the hospital has 80 beds and outpatient services.

    May 21, 2013 12:00:00 AM

May

July

August

October

November

SWA Recent Comments
At the Capitol
Impact Deals
Southwest Austin Twitter
    PDF Archives for SWA
    Like us!
    Now Hiring