by Samantha Bryant

June 26, 2012

Do you like this?

Hat Creek Burger Co.

Courtesy Hat Creek Burger Co.

Georgetown City Council voted 4–3 to approve the second reading of an ordinance for a special-use permit for a Hat Creek Burger Co. drive-thru restaurant at 405 S. Austin Ave.

More than 20 people spoke during the public comment period leading up to the council vote.

About 15 spoke in opposition to a drive-thru at the location on Austin Avenue between Fourth and Fifth streets for reasons such as pollution caused by idling cars, increased traffic in the neighborhood, and the potential traffic hazards caused by vehicles exiting the drive-thru and turning left onto Austin Avenue.

Georgetown resident Nancy Knight said a drive-thru in the proposed location was not in harmony with Georgetown’s downtown master plan, which encourages people to walk in the downtown area.

“I hope you’ll keep in perspective that this is one business that is asking for numerous exceptions and how many people are opposed to it,” she said to the council before the vote.

The Planning and Zoning Commission had voted 7–0 to recommend denying a special-use permit for the restaurant April 3. However, City Council passed the first reading of the ordinance with a vote of 4–3 at its May 22 meeting.

Since that time, Georgetown Historic District Planner Robbie Wyler said the developer modified the site layout to include an entrance and exit directly onto Fourth and Fifth streets, disconnecting the alley nearest to the adjacent neighborhood from restaurant traffic. The developer also plans to build an 8-foot-tall screening wall between the neighborhood and the restaurant.

Six people spoke in favor of the permit for Hat Creek Burger Co., saying their experience with the restaurant’s other locations in Austin had been positive and that Georgetown needs more restaurants like Hat Creek.

“I am in favor of Hat Creek coming in,” Kirk Kriegle said. “It will encourage people to come downtown.”

Councilman Tommy Gonzalez said that council had made exceptions to its downtown master plan in the past, and that any project on the site would generate traffic.

Council members Patty Eason, Danny Meigs and Rachel Jonrowe were the dissenting votes in the passing of the ordinance, which was amended by council members to say that the drive-thru must close by 9 p.m. every evening and that no more than 50 percent of its sales could come from the drive-thru.

The project will go before the Historic and Architectural Review Commission for a Certificate of Design Compliance review June 28.

by Samantha Bryant

June 26, 2012

Latest Comments

  • Hat Creek

    Sounds like a good compromise to me with the site changes regarding traffic routing and the 8 ft sound/sight barrier wall. I'd personally rather have a park there, but it's a valuable commercial site, and I recognize the wider needs of the community. I hope with the dreadful lack of compromise and forward progress going on at the federal level of our government, everyone involved here will accept the pros & cons of this development and move on with gratitude for all the good things GT has going for it. Incidentally, I live on that "alley" referenced in the article which backs up to the Hat Creek site; I'm not looking forward to the construction period at all, and only hope that the day to day operations don't greatly affect this neighborhood and my peace and quiet!

    Posted by Annelle Waddill August 18, 2012 17:09:56

  • Families Not Represented

    The people who would benefit most from an establishment like Hat Creek (with a playground!) are couples with young children. We just happen to also be people with the least amount of time and energy to show up to a city council meeting to declare what should be obvious. A place like this would families to enjoy more time downtown (and spend more money!). Instead, when the kids get hungry, we load up the car and go home. Once you eliminate restaurants that are too loud, too small (strollers!), too time consuming (waiting a half hour for a table is not an option), too expensive, or too 'adult' and you have absolutely nothing in the downtown area. Anything with a playground that isn't a national fast food chain is a dream come true for parents and would benefit the downtown economy greatly. I support the historic vision for downtown, but there needs to be some room for growth as well.

    Posted by Kristina Lewis August 17, 2012 17:19:08

  • Hat Creek

    I take umbrage at some sentiments in this article. This application is/was not "asking for numerous exceptions" - in fact, zero "exceptions" were part of it. The use of a "Restaurant, Drive-through" is permitted with the approval of a Special Use Permit (see the capital S in the chart in Chapter 5 of the UDC). No other "exceptions" were part of this necessary application process. Hat Creek was following the established process in the UDC, nothing more, and asking for nothing more than the code already allowed for this property.

    Secondly, the concept of walkability of the downtown really only applies to those fortunate enough to live within approximately a mile of the Square (a mile being about the edge of what normal folks feel is the maximum they are willing to walk, point to point. And remember, a mile there, a mile back). Everyone else who visits the square - Georgetownians or the outside folks we so desparately want to come frequent our town - arrives by....you guessed it - cars. Every 'nay' speaker at these meetings owns a car, and drives it on/near/around the square regularly. They said so much with their harrowing experiences of how poorly Austin Avenue is currently performing (seriously, Council should consider closing off downtown to vehicles based on how unsafe it was portrayed). Thus, you can't have it both ways - you can't claim downtown is for pedestrians only, and a drive-through is inconsistent with pedestrianism, when the majority of people access downtown by personal vehicle and the predominant land use in downtown is roads and parking spaces (most of which are lined with sidewalks...for pedestrians). Bicyclists, they are the ones with a valid gripe!.

    Thirdly, the downtown master plan is just that - a p-l-a-n. It is not law, black and white or some shade of gray. it's a framework of concise ideas, but no way the gospel or definitive guide. It represents an effort by citizens and Council to put down on paper what makes sense at the time, but in no way is set in stone.

    Finally, regarding the number of people opposed. The Mayor said 35 people signed up to speak Tuesday. That is 0.07% of the City's official population of about 47,000. Yes, it was more speakers than showed up 'for'. But hardly some representation of the constituency that Council should overwhelmingly and blindly vote along with rather than weigh the facts and circumstances before them.

    Posted by Stephen Fuller June 28, 2012 09:16:17

Add your thoughts

  

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Please do not post the same comment more than once.

GEO Impacts
  • Georgetown

    New Ownership: Jones Hearing Center

    Estes Audiology and Jones Hearing Center in Georgetown were recently acquired by Connect Hearing, which is part of Sonova Holdings Group.

    May 17, 2013 12:00:00 AM

  • Georgetown

    Coming Soon: Legacy at Georgetown

    Legacy at Georgetown, an assisted-living and memory-care facility located at 4907 Williams Drive near Sun City, is expected to open this summer. The facility will feature 58 assisted-living and 22 memory-care units.

    May 17, 2013 12:00:00 AM

  • Georgetown

    Coming Soon: Organic Spa Pro Nails

    Organic Spa Pro Nails is scheduled to open in early July in Wolf Ranch Town Center, 1015 W. University Ave., Ste. F3. The salon will feature organic, chemical-free materials in its services.

    May 17, 2013 12:00:00 AM

May

July

September

October

November

GHT Recent Comments
At the Capitol
Impact Deals
Like us!
Georgetown Twitter Feed
    PDF Archives for GEO
    Now Hiring