by Emilie Boenig

February 20, 2013

Do you like this?

City manager, union dispute budget impact

The Leander Professional Firefighters Association aims to bring civil service guidelines before a public vote.

The group delivered a petition Feb. 15 to the city with 137 supporters’ signatures. If at least 123 signatures—10 percent of the voters from the last municipal election—are verified, the measure will be on the May ballot.

Civil service rules establish standards within fire and police departments for sick and vacation time and for the hiring, firing and promotion of employees. Voters can adopt civil service with a simple majority.

The association, which is made up of all but a few career members of the Leander Fire Department, voted to pursue the initiative in November, though the idea had been researched the past four years, President Kirke Phillips said. In January, City Council and the association met to discuss the initiative, which is strongly opposed by the city manager and most members of council.

“I have to look at this as it affects 27 firefighters, but we are elected to represent more than 30,000 residents,” Councilwoman Andrea Navarrette said. “I do not see that it benefits the city in any way. And to me, that does not make sense, and I will not stand by something like that.”

Due process

Under civil service rules, firefighters who earn the top test scores are admitted and promoted “unless there is a valid reason” a second- or third-highest scoring tester should instead be hired or promoted. In that instance, the fire chief must provide a “good and sufficient reason” why the highest scorer was not selected.

Association member Matt Shapiro said due process improves the morale, recruitment and retention of quality career firefighters and keeps favoritism and politics out of personnel matters.

“I think it’s mostly preventative, but there have been some instances where we weren’t sure why this person was disciplined differently than another person. It’s also something that we want to make sure over the next 20 or 30 years, it’s done fairly no matter who is city manager, fire chief or on council, because that’s how long we want to serve in Leander,” Shapiro said. “This is about due process, and I think everyone can understand that there’s a problem when the person that disciplines you is the same person you have to appeal to.”

Civil service establishes a small commission of citizens who hear all wrongful discipline and termination claims. The city must also hire a civil service commissioner to oversee the commission and association.

Debated costs

City Manager Kent Cagle said administrative costs including the commissioner, the commission’s budget, attorney and legal fees would total $91,000 annually, a small part of the estimated cost of implementing civil service in Leander, if approved by voters.

“[Fire Chief Bill Gardner and I] took our estimates from experience. We looked at other cities with civil service, the budgets and the money that they spend,” Cagle said. “I think we have a middle-of-the-road projection.”

The association refutes Cagle’s estimate. Phillips said the fees would be closer to $1,000 per year.

The association hired a private auditor who calculated a 2 percent growth in tax values would generate a $215,856 increase in tax income, enough to sustain the association’s added cost estimates.

“As the city grows and more people move into the city, we believe the cost can be absorbed by that growth so that there wouldn’t be any cost impact, tax increase or anything of that nature,” he said. “Of all the surrounding cities, none of them have had a tax increase after electing civil service.”

Compared with the city’s current personnel policies, which handle all city employees the same, civil service provides firefighters additional vacation, sick and workers’ compensation benefits, a protection Phillips said firefighters need. Cagle estimates policy changes under civil service will cost the city an additional $308,006 annually. The association argues it will cost $170,172.

However, both parties agree there are expenses associated with implementing civil service.

“It doesn’t mean there’s going to be an exact commensurate tax increase, but we have to increase revenue some way or cut costs somewhere else,” Cagle said. “For them to say, ‘Well, we know there’s growth, and all of that revenue should go to the fire department,’ to me, that’s very unreasonable. We have needs all across the city.”

Mayor Chris Fielder said he supports the fire department but the added cost is unplanned.

“This is not about supporting the fire department. This is a financial decision,” he said. “It doesn’t matter if it’s $1 or $1 million, if there’s a possibility we’ll have to raise taxes to offset it, I can’t support it.”

Volunteers

Civil service does not include provisions for volunteers, and in a letter to the association, attorney B. Craig Deats said the courts have consistently held that using non–civil service firefighters to perform the same work as employees violates the state’s Civil Service Act. However, once the population reaches 50,000, Leander City Council can approve a meet-and-confer status that allows the association to negotiate with volunteers.

On Jan. 17, City Council unanimously approved an agreement with the Leander Volunteer Fire Department that reinforces the organization’s stance within the city. If voters approve civil service, Cagle said the volunteers will continue working alongside the paid staff without any changes, although the city risks being sued. He estimates replacing the volunteers would cost $609,957 annually.

“We are trying to make the best defense we can to keep them in case civil service passes,” Cagle said. “If none of the firefighters object, we are going to keep going until someone comes in and sues us, and then we’ll fight it.”

Association members insist they want to continue working alongside volunteers, especially because many members also started their careers as unpaid helpers. Because the volunteers are supplementary, Shapiro said the city would not need to hire new firefighters.

“Whether the volunteers are here or not here, we still have seven or eight people on shift every day,” he said. “By city code, we have a minimum staffing of career firefighters, and if volunteers are here or not, we still have to have that truck staffed.”

Joe Singer, representative for the Texas State Association of Fire Fighters, said some civil service departments have been able to work with staff and volunteers.

“There’s no contract. They are just letting them work,” he said.

More than 90 Texas cities have adopted civil service rules for their fire departments including Cedar Park, Georgetown, Round Rock and Austin.

Phillips said if civil service does not pass, the association will try to get the measure on the November ballot.

Updated Feb. 19, 2013, 9:22 p.m. CST City Manager Kent Cagle said the petition reached the required number signatures and City Council must now place civil service on the May ballot.

by Emilie Boenig

February 20, 2013

Latest Comments

  • for civil service

    Worried Leander Citizen,
    Who said the city would loose the fire chief? not one word I have seen has said the firefighter wanted to loose their chief. The firefighters seem to feel they need a fair process to hire and promote as they seem to think maybe it has not been in the past, they would know as they work there and you don't. You seem the think they would quit working out or training if it passes, that is insulting statement and proves you don’t know any of them or how hard they work. They accrue six shift a year, what if a family member is hurt or heaven forbid becomes sick enough for an extend stay in the hospital six days don’t go very far, currently if a firefighter is injuries at fire or on duty they go on workers comp and quit accruing sick and vacation hours and go to 60% of their pay , under civil service they would keep accruing and get their pay. When this happens maybe you can sign up to go to the burn unit and tell the family we are cutting your wages and stopping benefit time. Why don’t you contact a firefighter and ask him about 143 and they can explain it to you, not just take the word of a politician.

    Posted by It's about time March 06, 2013 14:21:26

  • Civil Service may be good for FF, but is it good for citizens?

    Civil Service may grant firefighters more vacation, more sick time, but at what cost to the citizens? And do they really need more vacation time? Currently, they work one day and have off two more. They don't even need to use vacation or sick time if they can trade hours with a buddy. They can have an entire week off work without dipping into their accumulated hours.

    Currently, Leander citizens have the benefit of volunteer staff. In most cases of Civil Service being put into play, the cities lose volunteers. Even losing their Fire Chief. We don't want that. Fire Chief Gardner is a supportive member of our community.

    Additionally, Civil Service offers more protection to the firefighters. That's great. But, let's ask why they think they need this protection? What's not fair? They are not getting protection from going into burning buildings. That is something instilled from their training via the programs Gardner puts into place. It's protection from being being treated like an employee. An employee that is expected to keep up their skills, training, health, etc. I understand they provide a service that I am unwilling or unable to do myself, but I'd like to think that we are holding them to a standard to stay knowledgeable, healthy, fit. That they are making good decisions.

    With Civil Service, it's just more and more politics protecting people who need to be able to protect us, the citizens.

    Posted by Worried Leander Citizen March 06, 2013 09:08:42

  • taking care of those that take care of us

    As a delivery of service, physically there probably isn't anything. But what it is doing is giving back to the firefighters just a smidgen of what they give to us on a daily basis. Who wants to do the job they do every single day for how much they get paid? I don't. There's no way I would go into a burning building or stand in the street trying to take care of a patient while other cars are zooming by. Not a great comparison but hopefully you get the point here. Everybody was in an uproar when they thought Apple was having workers build their iphones in sub-standard conditions and cried foul. It doesn't mean the product was bad or did making their working conditions make the iphone better, it was taking care of the workers. The firefighters are going to deliver the same service no matter what the outcome is and I'm sure of that. But, if some things going on in their department aren't fair, are you willing to risk losing the good guys to other departments and cities that do take care of their employees. I'd much rather have a person that is willing to take care of me because he knows we're taking care of them. It's the least we can do unless you want to hop on that truck and do it yourself.

    Posted by Randy Mitchell February 21, 2013 11:38:17

  • Benefit?

    How does the institution of Civil Service provide a benefit to the tax payers?

    Posted by P. Sherman February 20, 2013 14:26:06

Add your thoughts

  

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Please do not post the same comment more than once.

May

July

August

September

October

November

LCP Recent Comments
At the Capitol
Impact Deals
Like us!
Twitter Feed
    PDF Archives for LCP