by Christine Bolaños

February 3, 2012

Do you like this?

Terri Romere and Bobby Sieferman

Photo by Christine Bolaños

Round Rock ISD Trustees Terri Romere and Bobby Sieferman were the two dissenting votes at the Feb. 2 meeting concerning charges that Romere violated the Texas Public Information Act.

The Round Rock Independent School District Board of Trustees voted 5-2 Feb. 2 to ask the Williamson County Attorney's Office to investigate the actions of trustee Terri Romere concerning a forwarded email that may have violated the Texas Public Information Act.

The board discussed the issue in open session per Romere's request after initially posting the discussion as a closed session. After about one-and-a-half hours of discussion, the board agreed to turn the issue over to Williamson County. Trustees Romere and Bobby Seiferman voted against the measure.

The email in question was from a parent concerning school boundary changes which Romere forwarded to another member of the community without redacting the parent's email address.

The email was forwarded to Erik Okerholm who publicly opposed current boundary recommendations and proposed a plan supporting vertical alignment at the Jan. 19 meeting.

“I wasn't knowingly or intentionally breaking the law. There was nothing [in the district's policy] that said you can't forward an email,” Romere said. “The intent was to foster communication and to bring people together on a very divisive issue.”

“This is what I call retaliation against a board member who is in disagreement, and I feel like I'm a target today. You've taken a mistake ... and have blown it up.”

According to the district's legal policy, a person, including a board member, commits a criminal offense if the person distributes information considered confidential under the Public Information Act.

According to the Texas Public Information Act, the email addresses of members of the public who communicate with the government are confidential.

Romere's attorney, Ross Fischer, said the forwarded email does not violate the act because it was not disclosed in response to a public information request.

“I think [legal authorities] should be the judge of whether or not this was an illegal act. We are not in a position to deal with anything other than our policies,” Trustee Diane Cox said.

Board members agreed that the legal aspect of the act is out of their hands, but some pointed out that the board should discuss any ethical ramifications.

“It has been our policy not to disclose email addresses. I would be very, very concerned that members of the public couldn't communicate with us without fear of retaliation,” board member Catherine Hanna said.

According to district officials, the violation in question is considered “official misconduct” under the Public Information Act and is a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, a fine of up to $1,000 or both. Additionally, official misconduct by a school board trustee can be cause for removal from the board.

by Christine Bolaños

February 3, 2012

Latest Comments

  • Her actions were unethical

    All Ms. Romere had to do was ask the emailer for permission to forward his message. To do otherwise can result in intimidation, particularly when issues are divisive, as was the case here. It was unethical to take something that was sent to Ms. Romere in her role as a Trustee and send it to someone who has opposing viewpoints in order to further her own agenda. And yes, I consider getting a response from an unintended and opposing third party to be a form of retaliation for expressing an opinion in the first place.

    Posted by Concerned RRISD Parent February 03, 2012 22:41:34

  • Round Rock ISD Board of Trustees

    When you serve on the Board of Trustees for a public school district, you are required to complete training and preparation courses so there are no mis-steps in protocal or procedures when conducting School Board businees, in or out of the Boardroom. If there is "hot water" in this scenario, then someone got themselves there all on their own. There were 5 out of 7 members of that School Board who voted last night to send the matter to Williamson County for a legal determination of the incident. It was the right and appropriate manner in which to handle the indiscretion, intentional or not. I doubt that the gentleman who had his confidence crossed by forwarding his email without redacting his name would disagree. Not an overreaction by any stretch--just the right thing to do.

    Posted by mamad@yahoo.com February 03, 2012 15:22:28

  • care too much about the people

    This is what happen to a politician cares too much about the people she represents.

    Posted by anonymous February 03, 2012 15:00:16

  • bob@yahoo.com

    Holy overreaction, Batman! Not surprising that the old guard is trying to get Ms. Romere, who actually cares about the people she represents, in hot water.

    Posted by Bob February 03, 2012 10:11:26

Add your thoughts

  

All comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

Election coverage
Check out Community Impact Newspaper's previously published content on municipal and school board elections, and find election night results.
Round Rock | Pflugerville | Hutto Events

July

August

September

October

November

RPH Impacts
Impact Living Local 2012
Volunteer Guide 2012
Round Rock | Pflugerville Twitter
    Like us!
    RPH Recent Comments
    Built with Metro Publisher™