by

April 20, 2012

Do you like this?

Cedar Park funds, moves forward with tourism strategies

Partners planning to build a Schlitterbahn waterpark in Cedar Park are close to striking a new deal, a step toward advancing the city’s tourism goals. Although still in the midst of finalizing financing for the project, Bryan Redmond of Cedar Park Land, LP said he is confident the partners—Schlitterbahn, Cedar Park Land and investors—will reach a deal in May. No timeline or opening date has been announced.

“Over the last few months, we have been working through documenting agreements. It just takes that long when you have different parties involved,” he said. “We can’t go back to a city and ask to do something if we don’t have our agreements done.”

Phil Brewer, Cedar Park economic development director, said once the partners finalize a deal, the city intends to pursue a new single-phase economic incentive package similar to the $75 million, Phase 1 portion of the 2010 agreement. Future expansion will be addressed on a case-by-case basis.

“I’m extremely optimistic that we’ll be back at the table on this deal within the next 90–120 days, and we will have a completely new timeline we’ll be able to release and make everybody aware of,” Brewer said.

The original package

The January 2010 agreement outlines up to $86.25 million in reimbursements and tax kickbacks for the partners over four phases. Phase 1 reimbursements total $6 million over the first two years of operation.

The price and scope of the original Schlitterbahn project—$360 million built in four phases spanning 20 years—likely contributed to investor apprehension, Brewer said. A scaled-back version of the initial plan seemed more attractive to investors in a recovering economy, he said.

“The fact that we’ve pulled it back and we’re only looking at a Phase 1 makes it a lot more attractive. It’s not as speculative, like when you’re talking about a four-phase project with hotels and conference centers and a river walk,” Brewer said.

Funding tourism

Tourism projects in Cedar Park can be funded through many avenues. Brewer helped recruit Schlitterbahn, but the partners were responsible for finding investors.

Cash incentives such as the $6 million reimbursement pledged to the partners from the city’s 4B corporation—a tax-funded board that allocates funds for community development—are useful only when the market is responsive, Councilman Mitch Fuller said.

“The city has an incentive package in front of somebody, but most of the money is going to come from the private sector on this,” Fuller said. “Schlitterbahn is a perfect example of having the capacity to incentivize the private sector.”

Through 4B corporations, cities can use sales tax dollars for entertainment, parks, sports and other facilities as well as infrastructure. Cities can also use hotel occupancy taxes—in Cedar Park, a 7 percent tax added to overnight stays—toward funding tourism.

“The one thing about the use of HOT funds, whatever project is being considered needs to show some level of positive impact on the local lodging industry,” said Duane Smith, tourism and community development manager.

The Tourism Advisory Board reviews applications for HOT funds before final approval by City Council. The board allocated $64,275 last year for marketing campaigns, a volleyball tournament and a mobile tourism website.

“We’re not on I-35, which is historically where the commercial corridor is. So for Cedar Park to garner a lot of tourism, we really have to stand out in the area,” said Mel Kirkland, Tourism Advisory Board chair. “Now that we have a lot of foundational stuff that will bring people to town, it’s really about working off of that and getting our visitors to go from one event and then to another so they stay overnight.”

Ideas for additional tourism attractions—including a planetarium and science center, a festival and an ice rink—have surfaced in City Council and internal ad hoc committees. Smith said future tourism ventures could be eligible for HOT and 4B funds.

“It’s not just the impact on the hotel rooms. The whole thing is an economic impact for the city,” he said. “Part of it is the lodging, and part is what they’re doing here while they’re in town—going shopping and eating out. It all starts to add up.”

The big picture

Fuller said Schlitterbahn’s advancement toward breaking ground in Cedar Park, along with tourism promotion, coincides with City Council’s strategic goal to make Cedar Park a tourism destination.

“We want to create a city of destination that brings people into the city that don’t otherwise live here,” he said. “It creates economic activity when you are, and have a goal of being, a destination city.”

by

April 20, 2012

Comments (20)

Comment Feed

Schlitterbahn 2 be

I plan to retire from the airline and be the towel and smoothie guy at the new water park.

Randall Stephens 286 days ago

Excited....

We will live 10 minutes away from here and I'm psyched! I looked forward to the hopeful increased value of the home, as well has hopeful visits from relatives... The painful part will be the price of the season passes!

Beth Brindley 295 days ago

Property Value

Marianne, what makes you say this will not impact property value? I see this changing the overall landscape of the area and heavily impacting the area traffic as well, making it a less desirable place to live or even drive through. Thoughts?

RNS 330 days ago

Drag it down our way

Put this in round rock. Will make a nice tax break for us. cedar park and dry up

Jason Bo 346 days ago

From round here?

The road is PARMER not palmer.

Heck 353 days ago

Yes Schlitterbahn

Water is going to be recycled by Schlitterbahn, the intersection on Palmer and 1431 are being studied for improvements, our property value will NOT go down, it bring tax money in to the city and we will profit from this and businesses will bloom ! !
Things usually work out just fine.
DON'T WORRY, BE HAPPY !!

Marianne more than 1 years ago

Water?

I'd like an explanation of how this will effect local water sources in light of prolonged drought expectations by experts before we throw tax dollars at it in the name of tourism.

Leo more than 1 years ago

Please NO!!!!

Please rethink! That is such a bad idea! It will destroy the property value o all of the beautiful hill country homes in that area!!

Emily R more than 1 years ago

Bring Em

When Williamson Co voters pass the bond to widen 1431,from I 35 to Parmer I will be excited to see the Schlitterbahn go up. I will welcome the water park, restaurants, shops and jobs for the kids...right down the street. Bring it!

SchlitterNeighbor more than 1 years ago

1431 Improvements needed (on ROUND ROCK side)

The speed limit on 1431 from I-35 to the proposed site is 65Mph. Traffic will need to make a left turn directly into Schlitterbahn. There is no center divider and only two lanes in either direction. There is a lot of talk about improving the Cedar Park side of 1431, but the main source of the traffic will be from I-35 and through Round Rock. THAT stretch of 1431 needs to be fixed. There are already enough semis and other vehicles running red lights along that stretch. Throw in some kids in trying to cross 1431 from local neighborhoods to get to Schlitterbahn while cars regularly go 75Mph and we'll see what happens. There are enough near-miss accidents with Westbound cars making left turns into the Sonic parking lot right there as well.

In summary, the Round Rock stretch of 1431 from I-35 to the proposed site needs a lot of attention before this can happen, otherwise, it will take a couple fatal accidents to get the needed improvements. The New Braunfels Schlitterbahn didn't prop itself on the side of a dangerous highway where 70Mph speeding semi-trailers are common.

1431 Improvements needed more than 1 years ago

Bring it on!

If New Braunfels can handle the traffic Schlitterbahn brings, I'm sure we can too! I've been there several times and never experienced traffic problems getting there. And you have to drive through neighborhoods to get there, too. I think it will be fine here. Plus it will really boost our economy! The only question I have is where the water will come from, but I'm sure all our questions will be answered soon enough. I agree with Tim's last thought as well!

Monica DiSchiano more than 1 years ago

Horrible Idea

This is horrible idea as there are enough idiot drivers who do not know how to drive the speed limit on 1431 already. Add a bunch of idiot tourist and this spells D I S A S T E R.

Horrible Idea more than 1 years ago

Waterpark?

Are we, and most of the state, not in mandatory water restrictions? I haven't noticed any large rivers running through Cedar Park last time I checked so I guess this will compete with US for water use too?

CPCitizen more than 1 years ago

I love it!

I am very excited to know that Schlitterbahn is back on again for the Cedar Park area and for Austin. I think this is a great addition to the area! Yes, traffic is getting worse in Austin--but this is something that we are all going to have to live with and city officials across all of Greater Austin are going to have to figure out. Austin is Growing! That is not going to stop for a long time, so the question is not "how do we stop change?', but 'How do we adapt, leverage and take advantage of the change?'

Be thankful that our problems in the Austin area involve growth--not decline. tT

Tim Thornton more than 1 years ago

Yes - but think it through

Put the Schlitterbahn further north by the Metro stop in Leander. It gives the train a reason to run, reduces traffic and makes L/CP a destination, not a drive through town

leanderthal more than 1 years ago

yes to Schlitterbaun

This would be a great addition for a city that has little left to develope. As people begin to spend their money north into Liberty Hill and Leander, Cedar Park will need a destination like this to set itself apart from all the other suburbs scaping for dollars. With all the young familes and significant growth in the area, this project will be successful for all involved.

cpresident more than 1 years ago

LOL! Schlitterbahn. . .

Another profits-for-the-rich project that will cost taxpayers much and give nothing but headaches in return. Between what will end up long term as increased taxes on residents, heavy traffic issues in what had been a nice country drive, and a rise in crime, it's another screw the little guy project in the making. Good going Cedar Park!

AMen more than 1 years ago

Wrong location for Schlitterbahn

Why Toll 183 & 1431 location is not being considered is unbelilevable. The toll has been expanded and traffice can be handled more efficiently vesus building close to residential areas. There are more restaurants, service stations, and retail and convenience stores that will be able to handle the increase in traffice sales. I lived in New Braunfels near the original park and hated the the summer and never wanted to go anywhere on weekends because the traffic was terrible. The opportunity for job creation is great for teh area, but the right location is critical.

Laurie Christensen more than 1 years ago

Wrong Location for Schlitterbahn

Obviously those who are pushing forward for the Schlitterbahn in this area DO NOT drive on FM1431, east OR west!!!! In the past 8 years, FM1431 has become a major highway with traffic equal to or worse than parts of I-35. Traffic is already a nightmare! Why would ANYONE think putting a Schlitterbahn at the intersection of these two roads is a good idea? How about utilizing the new 183A Toll Road and putting the Schlitterbahn north of the Cedar Park Center? That seems a better fit!!

Vicki Richter more than 1 years ago

No Schlitterbahn!

The selected location for this is a huge mistake. The selected location and resultant traffic bottleneck it is going to create is going to have an adverse impact on CP and Leander businesses. Anyone who currently resides east of Parmer lane and currently contribute to the CP Tax base by supporting locals businesses will now be forced to take that business elsewhere as traffic at 1431 and Parmer and west is going to be a nightmare. CP businesses along 1431 and Parmer will suffer because people will avoid going west now and seek alternatives. This is a mistake that will certainly have negative impact on CP businesses. Much more thought should have gone into the location.

John Hevey more than 1 years ago

LCP Impacts

June

July

August

October

November

December

LCP Recent Comments
At the Capitol
Impact Deals
Like us!
Poll header
PDF Archives for LCP