by

August 14, 2012

Do you like this?

Pflugerville City Council

Photo by Blake Rasmussen

The Pflugerville City Council

The site for a new high school being proposed by Pflugerville ISD would require $18 million in road improvements to make the school accessible, Pflugerville City Manager Brandon Wade said at an Aug. 14 City Council work session meeting.

The price tag for road improvements took Pflugerville Mayor Jeff Coleman and the council members by surprise as they were meeting to discuss items on the upcoming year’s budget.

“Is there any way to have a joint meeting—like tomorrow—with the school district,” Coleman asked, “so that they understand the significance their decisions are having on the city of Pflugerville?”

Wade recommended the City Council call a city bond election for May 2013 to fund the road improvements. The proposed city bond election would coincide with an anticipated PISD bond election that will ask voters to fund the estimated $90 million construction cost of PISD’s fourth high school.

Coleman appeared dumbfounded that the city was being asked to come up with so much revenue in so short a time.

“I am not trying to be negative, but $18 million is a lot,” Coleman said. “In five years, we’ve only had a couple of things where people said they need $18 million from us in May.”

Combined, the two bonds could cost Pflugerville homeowners an additional 8 cents per $100 valuation in property taxes, Coleman said.

“I don’t take making this recommendation to you lightly—at all,” Wade said. “I just think if the school district is going to go out for this bond election, the voters need to see the full cost associated with building this school.”

Last week, the PISD board of trustees announced the purchase of a 149-acre tract of land in East Pflugerville for the site for the proposed high school. The primary access roads to the plot, located on Weiss Lane east of Hwy. 130, would be Pflugerville Parkway and Pecan Street. Both roads, in addition to Weiss Lane, are in need of major road improvements to accommodate the expected traffic the high school would bring, Wade said.

PISD is expected to pay $5.96 million for the land, which the district says could also eventually host both a middle and elementary school.

“Purchasing land is one of the most important investments a school district makes on the operational side of the house,” PISD Chief Financial Officer Kenneth Adix said in a statement released by the district last week. “We must identify land in areas of expected growth, while at the same time taking into consideration existing infrastructure like roads, water, sewer and electricity.

“Most importantly, we must be good stewards of taxpayer dollars with whatever purchases we make.”

Following the announcement of the land purchase by PISD, Adix said the district expected existing Travis County bonds to cover the anticipated costs of Weiss Lane improvements.

“[Weiss Lane] isn’t set right now to handle a high school,” Adix said. “It’s a viable option, given [the county gets] the road done before we start opening up that school.”

Wade, however, said the Travis County bond funding for Weiss Lane improvements is insufficient to cover the necessary road expansion needed for school traffic.

“We don’t have the roadway infrastructure that’s even close to being able to support this,” Wade said.

Councilman Brad Marshall said he recently met with PISD officials and understands the district’s need for a new high school.

“The data that [PISD is] looking at says they don’t have a choice,” Marshall said. “They have to do it, or they’re going to be behind the curve—putting portable buildings outside the (existing) schools.”

by

August 14, 2012

Comments (2)

Comment Feed

Focus on existing infrastructure first

The city should be able to provide some of these proposed developments with their existing budget and revenue. I personally find it odd that just one year ago, statewide teachers were being cut and now they are proposing building another school. Maximize existing capacity first on all sides. Also take a phased approach rather than try to pony up the entire 18M in bonds that will ultimately fall on the burden of an already highly-taxed homeowner base. What the city needs to do is focus on enhancing the existing roads and infrastructure to make Pflugerville a more consumer/business friendly town to keep up with its quickly growing resident population. For example, completing the frontage road along highway 45 as well as various hairpins to increase access to the Stonehill shopping center and similar business areas throughout the city. This is an example of where a few thriving businesses are situated along a major transportation corridor but fail to take advantage of additional through traffic due to harder access to the area. These same potential consumers just continue on to the next city that is more accessible. More business tax revenue equals more infrastructure enhancement equals continued expansion of schools, utilities, etc. if planned and managed properly. As for funding of such projects, city leaders need to also get creative and tap into county, state, federal and other private sector resources for some assistance; loans, grants incentives etc. Every other entity seems to do this so Pflugerville should get on the bandwagon.

Pflugerville Kevin 282 days ago

bond elections and debt issuance

it would seem the school district bond election should include the road development costs as well. If the school bonds pass and city's don't, then what? If the school pays, then all district residents would share the costs. If the road coats are paid only through the city, then only city residents pay the cost. It seems that what the school district decides should be borne by all the residents within its boundaries and not just city residents. How do others feel about this subject? Is the city obligated to improve the roads?

who pays? 282 days ago

May

August

October

November

RPH Recent Comments
At the Capitol
Impact Deals
Like us!
Round Rock | Pflugerville Twitter
    PDF Archives RPH
    Now Hiring