by

February 6, 2013

Do you like this?

Pflugerville City Council voted unanimously Feb. 5 to deny a petition for a public vote to create a new tax overlay district to Travis County Emergency Services District No. 2.

The decision means Pflugerville residents will not have to decide whether to allow up to 10 cents of new property taxes per $100 of valuation to fund additional fire department employees and equipment, but the denial could also result in the city taking on the cost and responsibility of municipal first-responder services.

“[The proposed tax] is a lot of money to put on the backs of the citizens,” Councilman Brad Marshall said. “This is not taken lightly. This is a very tax-sensitive council, and we want to be diligent.”

The proposed district—referred to as Travis County ESD No. 2A—would separate the existing fire department and first-responder services into separate branches with independent funding sources. Travis County ESD No. 2, commonly referred to as the the Pflugerville Fire Department, presently manages both fire and first-responder services for all of Pflugerville, as well as the surrounding extraterritorial jurisdictions (ETJ) of Austin, Hutto, Pflugerville and Round Rock that reside within Travis County.

First-responder services include basic life support and emergency medical technician on-site responsibilities but do not include ambulance transport of patients. Ambulance service in ESD No. 2 is provided by the City of Austin.

Marshall said before making its decision to reject the district, the council began looking into the feasibility of Pflugerville funding its own first-responder services as opposed to obligating taxpayers to a new funding district.

“What we believe is … the city could [create] its own EMS services,” Marshall said. “If ultimately we can do it less expensive, than why wouldn’t we?”

Department pleads its case

Over the course of three recent council meetings, representatives of the Pflugerville Fire Department and the Pflugerville Professional Firefighters Association presented their case for the need to create the new overlay district. Fire department representatives cited the district’s escalating response times to 911 calls and a funding gap they said was forcing them to operate off of reserve funds as reasons for the need of a new funding stream.

State law caps taxes for ESDs at 10 cents per $100 of property valuation.

“I think this is a matter of 'How is the [Pflugerville Fire Department] going to meet the needs of the community?'” said Steve Carlton, an attorney representing the PPFA.

Prior to the council’s decision, Carlton said the firefighters he represented were only asking the council to allow voters the right to decide whether to fund the additional services.

“You are not being asked to decide whether you agree or disagree with putting another district in place,” Carlton said. “What you are being asked to do … is let the voters decide if they want to improve their service. If you don’t consent, you are taking that decision out of the hands of the voters.”

Pflugerville Mayor Jeff Coleman, however, said it was his and the other council members’ responsibility to represent the interests of the voters.

“The voters did decide when they elected these five to the council,” Coleman said. “This is not a democracy, this is a representative republic.”

Repercussion

Although the council rejected the creation of the new taxing district within the city, the possibility exists that the areas outside of Pflugerville could still vote to fund its creation. The council joined the councils of Austin, Hutto and Round Rock in allowing residents within their respective ETJs the right to vote for or against the creation of ESD No. 2A.

“The primary logic is since we don’t currently provide services to the ETJ, it's unfair for [City Council] to speak for those residents,” Marshall said.

The next step in the process is for the Travis County Commissioners Court to decide whether to allow a public vote. The court is scheduled to discuss the issue at its Feb. 12 meeting in Austin. If the court approves the vote, residents outside of Pflugerville but within ESD No. 2 will be allowed to vote for the creation of the new district.

“An ESD 2A overlay is still a possibility for persons living in Pflugerville’s extra-territorial jurisdiction, outside the current city limits,” Pflugerville City Manager Brandon Wade said. “If nonresidents approve an additional 10 cent tax and a 2A overlay is created, the current ESD No. 2 will continue to collect 10 cents in property tax in Pflugerville for fire service, yet may no longer provide first-response emergency services in the city. The city would be responsible for the provision of first-response services for our citizens.”

by

February 6, 2013

Comments (6)

Comment Feed

Thanks for Nothing

I'm sure it is young Mr. LeBlanc's inexperience and not any malevolence that leads him to make such misleading statements.

Indeed the budget for San Marcos's expenditure for its fire department for the year was $6,192,219. But that doesn't tell the whole story.

If the city were an ESD, without access to sales tax, how much would it need to provide that level of service?
It’s pretty simple math. With San Marcos's tax base at $2.7 billion, one penny per $100 of property value would yield $270,000. (($2,700,000,000/100)*.01)).
Divide 270,000 into 6,192,219 to see how many pennies of property tax effort it would take to operate the fire department.
The result: About 23 cents per $100 of property tax.
Two-point-three times the maximum tax rate that an ESD can charge and 15% more than two contiguous ESDs could charge, had the Pflugerville City Council seen fit to give voters a say in the matter.
And that’s just the operations-and-maintenance portion of the fire department. It doesn’t include the general overhead expenditures that the city budgets under other categories (like the city legal department, the city secretary, the human relations department), functions that an ESD has to provide somehow — again — under that ten-cent ceiling.
Nor does it include the capital expenditures for big-ticket items like fire stations and fire engines that are calculated in another portion of the city budget. Once again: ESDs must pay off capital leases or bonded indebtedness and, along with everything else, keep its tax rate under the ten-cent cap.
Just to make sure this wasn’t an anomaly, I tried the same process with a city in southeast Texas and one in northeast Texas. Both came in around the same level, 25 cents and 22 cents, respectively.

I'm sure Mr. LeBlanc, with a little seasoning, will develop a keener appreciation for municipal budgets.

Cliff Avery, State Association of Fire and Emergency Districts 106 days ago

New ESD...

Justin-Before you make blanket comparisons between ESD#2 and Cedar Park or San Marcos you need to do some research. San Marcos is facing a critical shortfall in service because of the burdens Texas State is putting on it.. The $6 million you cite is likely only the direct operating expenses of the Fire Dept. All sorts of overhead and capital expenses are accounted for elsewhere in the City Budget.
The maximum taxing authority for ESD2A is almost a rounding error in our overall tax bill. less than 4% max.

Concerned Citizen 106 days ago

Arrogant City Council

Surprising that the City Council would make a decision regarding a critical service to residents and ignore experts including a Fire Chief who has served this City for 35 years. Fully integrated Fire and EMS is the standard around the country. If the City Attempts to go it alone without back-up from Austin-Travis County EMS or Pfugerville FD they will either find themselves with a totally inadequate service or more expensive service. Maybe the City should take a careful look at how it is spending citizens 50+ cents tax before denying voters the opportunity to decide if they want enhanced fire and EMS protection.

Concerned Citizen 106 days ago

Wrong-headedness

The Pflugerville City Council's decision will make the citizens of Pflugerville (of which I'm one) more taxed and less safe.

Does the City Council believe that it can duplicate the infrastructure that ESD2 has been putting into place for the past 20 years and provide emergency medical response for less money on the day that ESD2A becomes a reality? It won't happen.

And less safe? When ESD2A is created, the fire department that has been in this community since 1955 will not be able to respond to medical calls inside the City limits. If you have a heart attack at City Hall, three blocks away from the fire station downtown, those firefighters won't be coming. And right now, the City Council can't tell you who will be coming. Or how much it will add to your city tax bill.

Cliff Avery, State Association of Fire and Emergency Districts 106 days ago

Thank you Pflugerville City Council

Thank you for making the right decision. Now we they need to direct the staff to research disannexing from Travis County ESD 2 and providing a city-run fire department. If Cedar Park & San Marcos, who both have a larger service area and service population, can run a fire-department and first-responder services for $6 million per year, which is what we currently pay to ESD 2, then we can fund a department run by the city to do it for ourselves.

Justin LeBlanc 106 days ago

Thanks

I would like to thank the council for saying no to this. Property taxes are already very high, and with the health care district taking more, there is just a limit on how much you can expect people to pay.

LR 107 days ago

May

August

October

November

RPH Recent Comments
At the Capitol
Impact Deals
Like us!
Round Rock | Pflugerville Twitter
    PDF Archives RPH
    Now Hiring